vulnwatch
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Your Opinion

from [Andrew Kramer] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Your Opinion
From: Andrew Kramer <blackops@darwincentral.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 13:35:41 -0500
Cc: vulnwatch@vulnwatch.org, full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: bugtraq-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: mailing list bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: moderator for bugtraq@securityfocus.com
In-reply-to: <4C12C33FB9D17644817F45CDE1966274146B96@arthurdent.home.jalojash.org>
List-help: <mailto:bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
Organization: Darwin Central
References: <000e01c767fb$b1ca35e0$097393d1@MyBabies> <4C12C33FB9D17644817F45CDE1966274146B96@arthurdent.home.jalojash.org>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) 
Jim Harrison wrote:


IMHO, he's just plain wrong and is only making "they're being
meanie-poo-poo-heads" noises.
Presumably, in Thompson's world, the makers of Linux, *BSD, OSX, MVS, Solaris, (etc. etc. etc.), are even bigger poopyheads, since their operating systems never really required or benefited from his security products in the first place. Seeing as how the world owes him a living and all....
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [VulnWatch] cftp 0.12 (readrc) Local buffer overflow vulnerability, starcadi
Next by Date:  Re: Conflict of Interest - My summary, crazy frog crazy frog
Previous by Thread:  RE: Your Opinion, Alex Eckelberry
Next by Thread:  Re: Your Opinion, Forrest J. Cavalier III
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]